Archive for the ‘Personal Growth’ Category

Consensus–The Great Demand of 21st Century Leadership

Thursday, September 1st, 2011

I am frequently asked if being a leader is more difficult today than in the past. Unequivocally, yes!! Simply put – leadership today demands consensus.

Fifty years ago, leadership was defined by title alone. We lived in an age of authority where our culture encouraged (demanded, really) people to obey the person in charge. People fell in-step and followed the position.

A 20th century sociological phenomenon, however, eroded conventional authoritarianism – the more people are exposed to information and ideas, the more their respect for authority wanes. It is not that people have a disdain for authority itself. Rather, as people acquire more knowledge, they expect to participate in decision making processes.

A sure fire recipe for failure today is to impose a decision upon a person or a group without the input or participation of the parties who are expected to implement the decision. Fifty years ago, if a leader said jump, the societal response was “how high?” Today, the same command would be met with “why?”

This has had a profound impact upon how a leader must lead today. The modern leadership paradigm has shifted away from one that relied on compliance to one which demands collaboration. Today, rather than following a positional title, people follow the person. People do not follow an effective leader because they have to. They will follow that leader because they want to, because they believe in the leader. Once they believe in the leader, they will more likely believe his or her ideas. This is why character and trust are far more critical to being a strong leader than ever before.

Great leaders must have the emotional strength to lead not by command but by influence. The modern leader is committed to creating an innovative environment that consistently surfaces the best idea in a timely fashion. The leader of yesterday simply needed to create an idea and expect others to implement without question. Today’s leader must create the inspirational, cohesive environment that motivates team members to, when necessary, forego their own priorities for the greater good of the team.

In short, 21st century, consensus-driven leadership requires relationship excellence, strength of character, emotional security, inward awareness, and an ability to listen deeply. Today’s leader must have the self-confidence to surround herself with people who are individually and collectively more creative than the leader herself and inspire them through collaboration to conceive and implement extraordinary ideas. .

Today’s leadership journey begins with a deep look into and knowledge of oneself and then achieving necessary growth to inspire others to follow! Where leaders of fifty years ago needed primarily to know their crafts well, today’s leaders – above all else – must know themselves well. Given all of this, you decide the answer to the question! Is it more difficult to lead today than yesterday?

Leadership Trumps Everything!

Tuesday, August 16th, 2011

I have never observed a mediocre company stay mediocre when an excellent leader took over.  Conversely, I have never seen a company exhibit excellence under the hand of a poor leader.    In time, great leaders always find a way to win no matter how poor a hand the leader was dealt.  While companies may face additional barriers in today’s unpredictable economy, leadership will still prevail. Leadership trumps everything!

During the last few tumultuous years, I have had a ringside seat to observe the consistent differences between effective leaders and ineffective ones.  Below, I have highlighted several great leadership behaviors in contrast to poor leadership behaviors:

+Great leaders know that achieving results under challenging circumstances requires change.  This change begins with themselves and their choices – they must think differently, seek out opportunity, and refuse to give into fear.
-Poor leaders look for a magic pill, a gimmick, a savior, or an instant, easy solution that will turn the day.

+Great leaders accept the enormity of the environment, adjust to their “new normal” and focus on doing what it takes to overcome fresh challenges.
-Poor leaders obsess on the unfairness of the situation, place their energies on blaming who caused it, and lament why their responsibilities have gotten so heavy.

+Great leaders acknowledge their fear but choose to process through it.
-Poor leaders pretend they are not afraid but give their power to it.

+Great leaders find one more reason to keep going.
-Poor leaders find one more reason not to try.

+Great leaders help teammates see the possibilities.
-Poor leaders pull teammates down while lifting up the limitations.

+Great leaders are vulnerable, transparent, and rely on others.
-Poor leaders keep people at a distance, fail to reach out to others, and think they must do it themselves.

+Great leaders acknowledge freely that they do not have all of the answers and seek them from others.
-Poor leaders pretend they are superior and seek help from no one.

+Great leaders see mistakes as opportunities for growth.
-Poor leaders see themselves as mistakes.

+Great leaders inspire and attract.
-Poor leaders discourage and repel.

+Great leaders see themselves as the biggest obstacle
-Poor leaders obsess upon and magnify the obstacle.

It is true that the end is predicated by the beginning, that results are determined by how we act, and our actions are influenced by how we think!  Choose to think differently.

Whether it’s bear or bull, recession or expansion, successful leaders will themselves to win, to be their best, and to reach for the stars.  There is a clear link between how the leader thinks and how the company performs.

I dare you to think differently, to choose action over fear, opportunity over limitation, determination over paralyzation, deliberation over despair.  Great leaders…and their companies…do every time.  Leadership always wins!

Phantom of the Opera: Tripod of trust

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

In Andrew Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera, the Phantom who has hid himself, his disfigurement and his true talents in the depths of a Paris opera house, desires the love of the beautiful leading lady Christine. He uses tricks and fear to manipulate Christine and others in an attempt to obtain this. But instead, he is hunted down and captured. Only when his mask is removed and his true self is shown with all his flaws, does he get his true desire: a heart-felt kiss from the beautiful Christine.

This story has many parallels to stories of leaders charged with creating change within their organizations. Regardless of what or who you lead – whether it’s a company, a division or a department – if you are responsible for making changes, to be successful it is essential you possess three traits – the Tripod of Trust:

  1. Character
  2. Competence
  3. Clairvoyance

Character is the traits that make you who you are; qualities like honesty, loyalty, courage. If these traits are viewed as trustworthy, people will begin to trust you to lead them through the process of change.

Competence refers to your skills, knowledge and qualifications. To gain people’s trust you must prove yourself an expert in that area and be someone who knows what is best for the organization and all the people in it.

The first two traits should be rather inherent to the role of the leader and come naturally.

The third trait, clairvoyance – which in this context means being transparent.  It is often the most difficult for leaders to develop because it seems counter-intuitive to leadership. Allowing the people around you to see who you really are, both personally and professionally, your strengths and your weaknesses, when you are supposed to be the leader may make you look flawed and less than capable of leading.

But the truth is that in order to be an effective leader you cannot hide from others. You must open yourself up – allowing people to not only see your professional and personal strengths but your professional and personal weaknesses. Leaders who do not do this create a subtle but unmistakable message: “I won’t let you close. I do not trust you enough to risk you knowing me beyond professional boundaries.” The impact of this causes people to step back from you with similar distrust, and you cannot lead others who are stepping away from you. People do not distrust you any less because of your weaknesses. They trust you more, because you have shared them with them and you have been honest.

Likewise, covering up aspects about the change that is forthcoming creates distrust, It implies, “I’m greater than you. You don’t need to know.” And while you might believe you are doing this for good reasons, like people’s protection, it ultimately comes across as patronizing, and this type of attitude creates resentment, and ultimately resistance.

So what type of leader are you? Do you operate like the Phantom, using masks and secrecy? Or are you transparent? Like Christine, people can handle the truth. When you are truly open with them – showing your strengths and flaws, true trust is created and the change process will begin.

Play Ball!!

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

During a flight from Phoenix to Detroit,  an Umpiring Crew Chief of Major League Baseball asked me, “Fred, how can my guys feel good about themselves when they can’t win?” He went on to explain the most significant challenge in leading a professional umpire team is keeping the morale and the passion of his men up.
 
If we do our jobs well, we are invisible, receiving no acclaim or appreciation for our expertise.  If we do our jobs poorly, we are scrutinized the next day by the media, only after we have been given new names by the crowd during the game.  After a while it grates your sense of worth and contribution.

His question is one I find myself answering frequently in similar conversations with executives throughout the country.  “How can I win in an unwinnable situation that is outside of my sphere of control?”  Today, many people in the U.S. including homeowners, real estate professionals, nurses and doctors, business leaders, workers, charity heads and corporate executives are all struggling with “keeping faith in themselves” in such a daunting time.

My answer was the only one that came to mind.  Winning in what appears to be an unwinnable situation begins with changing the audience for which you are playing in front of.  It’s really about stepping back and asking yourself, what are the non-negotiable values in your life that you want to pass on to your children?  They are the qualities that you know God, your family and yourself would honor.

If your crew can be true to themselves, no matter how loud the crowd is screaming, complaining, or even applauding, then they have won a great victory of not losing themselves while trying to be all things to everyone else.

When society’s outside measurements tell us we are not winning when we lost our jobs, our homes, our positions, our retirement dreams or even the cheers from the crowd, if you have kept your integrity, your humility and your character, you have won no matter what!

My umpire friend replied, “You know, I made a bad call in the game last night. That crowd was tough on me.  I wish I had those words when I was beating myself up. They are so simple but yet it is something to hold onto in the moment…We all lose sight of that.  Being true to my inner umpire”, he said laughing.

That’s right, Play ball!

Kindness, An Essential of Leadership

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

In a conversation with a Phoenix civic leader, we shared mental notes regarding a mutual acquaintance regarded as a key leader among Arizona CEO’s. Our notes were dissimilar.

Experiencing him completely within a personal context, she regarded him as warm, kind and intuitive. My encounters with this gentleman, however, revealed another side, characterized as arrogant, abrupt and distant. Noting I appeared to have met the “dark side” of Mr. X, she replied, “I have never met that side of Mr. X but, I am under the impression there are two sides to Mr. X, his private self and his leadership self”. She then offered an explanation, “When at home or in a social setting he is a wonderful man, but when he leaves for work, he puts on his armor!”

Mr. X appears to subscribe to a common fallacy within leader circles. To be kind, real and vulnerable (in another word, human) is a sign of weakness, not strength. Leaders must not be transparent but rather keep their guard up at all times. This notion could not be further from the truth. In fact, a lack of kindness in a leader actually sabotages a leader’s effectiveness. Being rude, arrogant and guarded as a leader pushes people away from us as opposed to attracting people to us. It is impossible to lead others who are moving away from us.

Abraham Maslow, one of the fathers of modern psychology, noted people are most effective in reaching their potential when their internal basic needs are met. One of the basic needs after air, nourishment and shelter, is the need for emotional safety. Simply, this means all of us have an undeniable need to be affirmed, valued, appreciated and respected. Any leadership behavior that does not demonstrate sensitivity to these basic human needs will cause others to feel unsafe.

Simply put, followers will not follow a leader who makes them feel unsafe. Why? Please allow me to provide the basic logic. Our inherent human nature does not allow us to trust people who make us feel unsafe. We will not follow another whom we do not trust. Without followers you are not leading, even if you have the title that says so!

What is the appropriate approach? The golden rule provides the most succinct yet powerful core principle for effective leadership. In summary it states, “Treat people the way you wish to be treated”.

Some may suggest Mr. X is doing all right as a leader. After all, he has developed a national reputation as a leader. Conversely, he has also developed a correlating reputation as a difficult person who could dehumanize others in his quest for results. The real question is, “How much more effective could he be if he had the inner security to respond to those he leads with transparency and kindness?” How many people have quit following him who could have strengthened his success as well as their own, but left instead in search of a healthier leadership environment? How many missed opportunities have there been because he failed to treat others with compassion and kindness?

Powerful leadership results can transpire over a simple act of kindness. For instance, one could argue the great state of Alaska was acquired because of a missed single kind act. Witness the following compelling example of leadership and kindness.

President-elect Lincoln, while traveling by train, was deeply immersed in thought concerning the composition of his leadership cabinet. The choice for Secretary of State was still unfilled as he was torn between two highly respected finalists.

On the same train, in the same car, unbeknownst to each other, sat one of the men whom Lincoln was considering for the position of Secretary of State. He had an appointment to meet with Mr. Lincoln the next morning. While sipping brandy and pondering how he might win the prized appointment, he called for the steward to refill his glass. Because the steward was finishing pouring a beverage for another, he did not immediately respond. When he did arrive moments later, the man berated the steward for serving a man of his own stature in such a poor manner. Excoriating him not to let it happen again, he sent the embarrassed servant away.

Mr. Lincoln heard the exchange. The next day Mr. Lincoln chose the other finalist, William Seward, later responsible for purchasing the Alaskan territory amidst great criticism. Asked why he did not choose the other man (who had ridden in his same coach car the previous day), Lincoln responded, “In this age of incivility, I want a man who will treat others with civility and kindness. I became convinced, due to personal experience, that one candidate perhaps lacked such character.”

Wise are the leaders who encourage genuine kindness and courtesy as an essential aspect of their core leadership style. Do not underestimate its impact on your influence as a leader. Believe me, your followers will not!

Listening to Learn

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Winning attitudes translate into success at all levels. Recognizing and emulating the winning attitude of a successful person is not just a compliment to a role model, it’s an essential element in developing your own success. A good friend, Joe, recently told a story which makes this point as relevant today as when he first learned it.

Joe possesses a winning attitude which has translated into a very successful company and he is a man that others watch; however, Joe began life focused on himself rather than on the successes of others, a flaw he had to overcome quickly in college:

“When I was a freshman playing football I was ready to set the world
on fire. I thought I had arrived and it was just a matter of showing it
to my teammates,” he laughed. “One day I was standing in line in the
weight room waiting for a machine and I was talking most of my wait.
After a while I heard an imposing voice behind me ask ‘Do you want
to be good?’ I turned around to find the 6’8” senior captain of the
football team behind me. He was revered for his athletic abilities
and leadership and I was surprised by his question.

He asked me again: ‘Do you want to be good?’

Yes sir, I do, I said.

‘Then stop talking and start learning,’ he commanded. ‘There are
veteran players on those machines; have you observed their
technique. Are you watching to learn what they do? On this team, if
you want to succeed there are no wasted moments. You can talk, or
you can wait quietly in line and learn; but only if you want to be good.’

That was a lesson I never forgot. I apply it every day in my work, and
I teach my executives to do the same: be quiet to learn.

We all face times waiting for growth in our careers and personal lives; we all have experienced stalled economies that slow our goals and dreams, when our aspirations can’t advance as quickly as we desire. At those times, it feels as if we’re standing in a slow line instead of being in the center of the action. However, how we handle those moments is the key to being good. We can chose to determine our future success by maximizing the opportunities in front of us during those stalled moments. Instead of complaining about circumstances, miring ourselves in excuses or becoming complacent until it’s our turn to receive our desired progress, we need to observe, learn and anticipate results. When the wait is over a plan should be ready to execute. Significant advancement does not happen by taking the waiting periods for granted. Forward-thinking leadership uses waiting periods for growth and improvement.

So, who are you watching and emulating? Are you investing in your own development, personally and professionally? How are you turning what may possibly be your most difficult challenges into blessings in disguise? When Joe was standing in the midst of his peers wasting time and distracting his teammates, he could have become defensive when confronted by his team captain and dismissed the message he needed to hear. Instead, Joe abandoned his ego in order to absorb direction from a successful player, and he made that lesson his own. How prepared are you to check your ego, to be quiet and welcome learning opportunities during the slow times? Will you be ready to initiate a new strategy the moment your wait is over, or will you still be standing in a slow line waiting for your turn?

Leadership and Getting Out of Its Way

Monday, February 15th, 2010

While having coffee with a friend who possesses a larger-than-life personality, and the physique to match, he shared a story regarding his twelve year old son, the quarterback of a team for whom he is the head coach. Like everything else, my friend is big into leadership and relishes every opportunity to pass leadership principles onto his son.

My friend said that he had been pushing his son for some time to show more leadership, and to offer motivating challenges to his teammates while in the huddle between plays. The big man shared an important lesson he learned from his son regarding his attempts to lead by constant example:

During practice I had this habit of joining the huddle almost every play and offering words of wisdom to players who needed instruction and guidance. I was becoming annoyed with my son because I did not see him practice the same behavior with his teammates that I was attempting to instill in him. Over dinner one night, I pushed him to not merely be a player; I said he had a responsibility to be a leader and that he wasn’t exhibiting leadership with his teammates.

The next day I continued to offer words of encouragement to the boys in the huddle. I waited impatiently for my son to speak up rather than having instruction come only from me. Another coach meanwhile asked me to come to the sideline to attend some other matter. All of a sudden I heard my son barking orders confidently in the huddle. Amazed, I watched at a distance as this continued for several plays. I was equally impressed how the boys responded to my son’s directives.

After practice I asked my son, “What got into you out there in the huddle? You finally started acting like a leader.”

My son replied with a statement that humbled me with one of those life lesson moments:

“Dad I have been trying to lead,” he said. “But you were so big in the huddle that there was no room left for me.”

My friend recalled the power of that moment for him, both personally and professionally, because it had a direct application to the company that he owned and operated as well. He shared that in the first few years after he purchased his company, he was constantly bothered that his managers relied on him to make every important decision.

Up until then, I thought the problem was with them. On the way home from my son’s practice that night, I realized I was the problem, not my managers! I thought that I had to be in on every play to help my operating team. I didn’t want them to fail so I constantly intervened in my managers’ decisions. I realized I was doing the same thing with my managers at work that I was doing with my son on the football field. I insisted on being “so big” in the decisions of my leaders that I was preventing them from the chance to grow and to lead. They didn’t trust themselves to make decisions because my over-involvement displayed my own lack of trust in them. I learned that sometimes one of the most powerful moments for a leader is to just get out of the way.

Today my friend’s company is known across the Midwest as leading the way in developing highly engaged and high results environments. He is recognized for growing leaders from within his own organization. Frequently, while speaking to business leaders desiring to duplicate his success, my friend recounts that one of the most important steps along his journey was the day he realized that great leadership sometimes means just getting out of the huddle and out of the way. Only until he was willing to change himself in this regard, could my friend expect to see changes in his leaders as well.

Leading Successfully Starts With WhoYou ARE, Not With What You DO!

Monday, February 1st, 2010

One of my executive clients was interviewing for a leadership position at the helm of a prestigious national sports team. Asking for my help to prepare for the interview process, I readily agreed, and I asked him to be prepared for a mock interview.

At the onset of our practice interview, he pulled out a notebook and began to explain his system of interviewing and recruiting players that had been part of his success!

“Bill (not his real name), what are you doing?” I asked.

“This system is the key to my success,” he confided.

“Bill, if you go in there telling them what you do as the basis for your success, you will lose them right there. Everyone else competing for this job will do the same thing. It’s not about what you do, it’s about who you are that distinguishes you from the rest.”

I went on to explain to Bill that no one buys into a leader’s system until they buy into the leader first. They will not trust his approach until they trust the person behind the approach.

I challenged him to share his passion and vision first: what gets him out of bed in the morning, and why it matters so much to him. I coached him to describe his non-negotiable values and illustrate how they guide his life and serve as a filter for all key decisions he makes, both personally and professionally.

“Bill, share how the impact of your values will positively affect the organization, and then ask the owner if he would support these values at any cost as the basis for building a trusted organization. Everyone else is going for a job interview to sell themselves. You are way beyond that. You are going in that room not to get a job, but to be yourself, with quiet, confident and humble assurance.”

Bill questioned the approach: “What if he’s turned off?”

“It’s just information,” I reminded him. “If he is turned off by you being true to yourself from the start, then do you really want to partner with someone like that? If this owner is anyone of real substance, he will understand that you cannot lead others if you haven’t developed and incorporated an internal map to lead yourself first. He will know that truly great leaders have a clear sense of self. From your clarity of values, those around you will rise to the level of your convictions.

That is leadership Bill. Only after you have shown who you are can you begin to discuss your methods of success. Everyone has methods. Not everyone has clarity of purpose or a clear sense of self. This will set you apart.”

We went on to finish the trial interview and I made some final comments. A week later, Bill came back to me and described the actual interview:

“You know Fred, your advice was right on target. The owner expected everyone at that level of expertise to have a proven system. He had already called around the league and knew everyone’s approaches before the interviews. More than that, he really wanted to understand what kind of leaders we were and whether we were led by the shouts of others or by the whispers inside of ourselves.”

Three days later, the respective owner announced his decision: my client, Bill, was awarded the position! I don’t know who was happier, him or me.

It is true that people will follow us, not because what we do, but because of who we are. Who we are always precedes what we know, what we do, and how we do it. It is one of the non-negotiable principles of effective leadership.

Taking Control When All Else Feels Out of Control

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

In the past month, I spent time with a team of leaders at a powerful, Midwest company. These leaders expressed a widespread fear – they’re worried about the economy and losing their jobs. In just a few hours, we worked to reposition their thinking by exploring concepts that they said “provided them with a much-needed shot in the arm and renewed focus”. This is the lesson we shared:

The vast majority of people in the United States are fear based. When circumstances are difficult, fear-based people focus on others, external events around them, and the solutions of others as the means to address their fears and find a sense of control in their situation. Unfortunately, when we depend on others for our solutions, we miss a powerful means for facing difficulty – taking responsibility for ourselves and for the outcomes we desire.

Many of us fall into “victim thinking” in uncertain times. We give away our power (or energy in terms of time, focus and resources) to events, the economy, other people, or to the fear itself. This act of giving away our power has a tendency to take on a life of its own, and begins to paralyze and exacerbate those all-too-familiar feelings of hopelessness.

The following six behaviors indicate that you may have fallen into this attitude or filter in your own life. This is where you have to face the mirror and say, “Have I been acting out in one of these ways?”

  1. Blaming: Pointing the finger at something or someone else for your situation. “My problems are because of my boss.”
  2. Self-pity: Rolling up in a ball and having your own little pity party – poor you. “It’s not fair”.
  3. Hopelessness: Feeling like there is nothing you can do. “I have no options.”
  4. Resignation: Losing motivation by checking out. “I am just going to go through the motions”. You can’t always control what happens TO you but you can control what happens IN you when it happens to you.
  5. Anger turned to bitterness: Resentment toward another person, event or circumstance. “I will never forgive him” or “She is going to pay for that”.
  6. Entitlement: Feeling like you deserve special treatment. “I deserve a pay raise because I have always received a pay raise in the past” or “I deserve a hefty bonus because I am the CEO of this company”.

Victim thinking depletes our passion, hope and solutions. We often get stuck on the events in question rather than looking inward for alternative ways of addressing the situation. But when we choose to take responsibility to alter the reality – even when we didn’t directly cause the problem – we are seeking a more desirable outcome, which is an empowering step to take.

Recently, a friend of mine provided me with a great example of how she moved from being a victim to taking responsibility. She recently lost her home and for the first few weeks, was very bitter. All she could think about was how unfairly she’d been treated and how her life was ruined. One day, she realized that while she was so absorbed with blaming everyone else, she had failed to look inward and ask what she could do differently – what she could do to turn the situation into something positive.

When she began to take responsibility to change her attitude, she began seeing things in a new light. While she missed her home, she thought about how much clutter had piled up in that house. In a strange way, she felt relieved when she took responsibility for the fact that she’d overcommitted to this particular financial situation. Now, her energy was redirected to correcting her behavior instead of blaming others for her misfortune.

She began re-examining her values, simplifying her life and focusing on relationships rather than possessions. In her rented apartment, she learned that she could be just as happy and could get by with so much less. She found an “incredible release from the pressure of just trying to keep up with all the stuff”.

In that uneasy time, she could have stayed bitter. But she made the choice to become better. If you are facing a difficult situation, either personally or professionally, take action. Ask yourself if you have given into “victim thinking” and make a plan with these key questions in mind:

  • Without beating yourself (or your team) up, what are the things I/we could have done differently that might have led to a different outcome in that specific area?
  • What are the barriers or obstacles keeping me (or my team) from the desired reality?
  • For every obstacle named, what are three specific actions I/we can take to positively impact the outcome?

The key to finding empowerment in fearful days is to take responsibility for the outcome you desire. Face your fear (everyone has fear). Develop a specific plan. Be prepared to make adjustments. Work the plan. Recommit to the plan each and every day, and correct the course along the way – as with any strategy, the odds of reaching your goals are much higher with the right attitude and a specific roadmap to guide your journey.

The Business Case for Forgiveness

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Often, I am summoned to work with executive teams that have become highly dysfunctional and are struggling to lead effectively. Dysfunction in a team hurts business!

It slows down the speed of decision-making. Instead of executives being able to put issues and concerns on the table in real time speed, a tap dance commences. Team members measure their words, engage in political speak, or avoid the issues altogether, therefore sending them back under the table to fester and grow. Rather than deal with issues decisively, time is wasted as teammates spend more time posturing in official meetings and ally building in the “real” meetings before or after the meeting.

This dysfunction lessens the quality of decision making. Important information which may be uncomfortable to share for fear of repercussion, of a dress down from a leader, or of body language from teammates that shout disapproval, is kept under tap. Thus key insights are kept from the discussion that could lead to more effective solutions.

A common link between every dysfunctional team I have assisted is that there is always an underlying “un”forgiveness issue(s) that has eroded relationships among some or all team members and their ability to work together collaboratively and or effectively. Just this week, an executive revealed to me that he dreaded coming to work because of deep resentment toward his boss after some uncomfortable interactions. He indicated that he now avoided conversations for weeks at a time with his boss and had even become resistant to working with his peers of whom he regarded as his boss’ allies. His performance was definitely impacted!

Upon asking me what he could do to change the situation, I told him that he had given his power away to his boss. His feelings about another had literally taken control and were now driving his poor attitude and subsequent performance. In effect, his boss was now in complete charge, even of his private emotions. Asked how he could break this miserable cycle, I told him the first step was to take back his power by forgiving his boss.

I explained that forgiving his boss was not about pretending those hurtful episodes had never happened. Neither was it about becoming best buds nor trusting him upon the moment of the granting of forgiveness (forgiveness and trust are two separate issues). Forgiveness required his conscious decision to begin the process of letting go of his inner wrath toward his boss! He wouldn’t have to make him his confidant, but he didn’t have to remain hostile either. It was a choice to become emotionally neutral. Lastly, I reminded him that it was a process that would require him to renew that commitment to himself each time those painful feelings resurfaced.

He laughed as he told me that he wasn’t expecting a “churchy” answer but that it was truly great business advice. Although forgiveness certainly is part of the spiritual realm, it also would be his first step toward genuinely reengaging his boss and his team. His leadership success depended on it. His responsibility to himself demanded it even more. Ultimately forgiving someone is the ultimate act of self-leadership. If you are not willing to lead yourself, don’t expect to be effective in leading others. Comments??!!