Archive for the ‘Leader Development’ Category

Oops I Made a Mistake!

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

Stories filled the media last month concerning the USDA official who was abruptly fired by the Agriculture Secretary after her recorded remarks to an audience appeared to boast over recent discriminatory actions against a white farmer.  An edited video of her speech had lifted snippets of her statement, deliberately twisting the message and intent of her speech to support a conservative talk show host’s critical views toward the NAACP.  The video excluded her ending remarks providing a wider context of regret for her previously racial insensitive attitudes, calling people to rise above discrimination.

In the ensuing media storm, White House officials called for her dismissal. The lady, a widely respected leader in her field, was summarily dismissed and publicly humiliated, her decorated career seemingly ruined.  However, controversial anger soon turned to embarrassment once the full video recording aired, clearly showing her speech had been misconstrued.

Realizing he had served a grave injustice against this woman, the next day Agriculture Secretary called a press conference and admitted he had made a terrible mistake. He stated he had rushed to judgment and acted in error without having all of the facts.  He confessed the deep damage and great pain upon the innocent lady and her family.  Apologizing profusely to the woman, both publicly and privately, he took full responsibility, neither offering excuses nor blaming others.  He offered her a new position. She responded magnanimously with forgiveness and conciliatory words. The media firestorm was extinguished, as quickly as it had erupted.

No leader is perfect.  We all have made serious mistakes.  A defining characteristic of a true leader is not the absence of mistakes but rather how he or she responds after the error has occurred.  This human leader showed amazing leadership by taking responsibility in a transparent, honest and sincere manner.  He didn’t find a scapegoat within his agency.  He didn’t skewer irresponsible media activity. He didn’t resort to legally safe language designed to ward off litigation.  He did the right thing.  He said, “I’m sorry.  I have wronged you.  I will make it right.”

Afterwards, while teaching leaders, from various racial backgrounds, I asked them, “Knowing the gravity of his mistake and his subsequent response, do you have greater trust toward the Secretary or do you trust him less?”  Unanimously, the group said their trust in the Secretary increased!  They appreciated his transparent humanity, his humility and lack of ego had created deeper respect.

One of the most powerful effects a leader can employ is to say “I’m sorry”.  Many leaders carry the mistaken notion to admit one’s mistake is an act of weakness, that doing so may weaken their leadership position.  This could not be further from the truth.

One of the surest way leaders can undermine their leadership credibility with their people is to refuse to acknowledge and apologize when they have been wrong.   Such arrogance is a deathblow to followership.  Conversely, the strength to admit one’s error can raise the trust quotient.    True humility and sincerity can turn a moment of  miscue into an opportunity to win the hearts of others.  I wonder, how would you have responded if you had been in the  Secretary’s shoes?  Ask your people how they think you would have responded based on your past behaviors?  Their answers may provide pause for reflection.  You might even have to own up to some things and say, “I’m sorry.”

Are You Working In The Dark

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

Fluorescent lights illuminate my garage.  One of the “two bulb” fixtures was flickering and the faulty bulb replaced.  After the new bulb was installed, I noticed the remaining “non-flickering” bulb was quite a bit dimmer than the new bulb installed alongside of it.

Prior to the replacement of its “flickering” partner, I had no idea anything was wrong with the light bulb now in question.  However, when paired against fresh competition, it was obvious that over time the light bulb had lost much of its effectiveness.

The ongoing effectiveness of leadership teams can be compared to the light bulb I’ve described above.  Leadership teams can get into a fixed pattern of doing things, of tackling problems and issues and of devising solutions.  Without realizing it, the teams can fall into a gradual rut without even realizing it is happening.  Left to its own, the team can “dim” over time.  Nobody notices at first because the team is still working as hard as ever, still diligent in guiding the organization.

Realistically, every team dims over time.  If two or more of the following characteristics exist, it is likely the team’s effectiveness has been significantly compromised.  Excellent team leaders recognize this as a given reality of team dynamics and implement systematic processes to combat the lethargy.

10 Signs of a “Dimmed” Team
1.  Working with the team is not as invigorating.  A sense of boredom
and routine has set in.  It is just not as fun as it used to be.
2.  Team members have developed various camps within the team as
synergy has given way to political maneuvering.
3.  The team has become an isolated reservoir.  Ideas are flowing into the
team, but the team is not invigorating the rest of the organization.  It
concentrates on being crisis control central instead of providing a
sense of hope, stimulation and empowerment for others.
4.  Teammates jockey for power and influence as turf protection wars
are common.
5.  Unresolved conflicts and tensions between teammates affect trust
and openness.
6.  Expertise from persons outside of the team or organization are
resisted, viewed cynically or even are attacked as it may reflect
upon them critically.
7.  Email wars are common instead of healthy, direct conflict resolution.
8.  Persons within the team are concerned about getting credit
for successes.
9.  Team members are primarily concerned about their own
agendas instead of prescribing what is best for the overall
success of the organization.
10. Sacred cow personalities or issues exist.  Fear of conflict or
retribution persists over a commitment of principle-based decisions.

Please consider these questions as you evaluate your positioning:

Do you regularly introduce your team to innovative books, articles and journals on relevant leadership topics?  Does your team conduct a thorough examination of company needs, challenges, goals and initiatives at least every two years?  Are outside coaches and resources utilized to stimulate new thinking and growth for individual team members?  Are cutting edge leadership development processes regularly utilized by your team?

An interesting finding…the strongest teams are committed to processes that strengthen the team in a continuous, ongoing fashion.  Ironically, the “dimmest” teams routinely view such efforts as superfluous.  Such teams are typically focused on yet another problem, justifying that time does not permit them the “luxury” of investing in their team’s growth.

In determining whether it is timely to invest in efforts to “brighten” your team, which of the following comparisons best describes your leadership team?

A flickering bulb
A steady floodlight
A lighthouse beacon
A small nightlight
A bulb that won’t work

If you don’t know which of the above comparison best applies to your team, ask those in the organization outside of the team.  I have a strong suspicion they already know the answer.

Kindness, An Essential of Leadership

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

In a conversation with a Phoenix civic leader, we shared mental notes regarding a mutual acquaintance regarded as a key leader among Arizona CEO’s. Our notes were dissimilar.

Experiencing him completely within a personal context, she regarded him as warm, kind and intuitive. My encounters with this gentleman, however, revealed another side, characterized as arrogant, abrupt and distant. Noting I appeared to have met the “dark side” of Mr. X, she replied, “I have never met that side of Mr. X but, I am under the impression there are two sides to Mr. X, his private self and his leadership self”. She then offered an explanation, “When at home or in a social setting he is a wonderful man, but when he leaves for work, he puts on his armor!”

Mr. X appears to subscribe to a common fallacy within leader circles. To be kind, real and vulnerable (in another word, human) is a sign of weakness, not strength. Leaders must not be transparent but rather keep their guard up at all times. This notion could not be further from the truth. In fact, a lack of kindness in a leader actually sabotages a leader’s effectiveness. Being rude, arrogant and guarded as a leader pushes people away from us as opposed to attracting people to us. It is impossible to lead others who are moving away from us.

Abraham Maslow, one of the fathers of modern psychology, noted people are most effective in reaching their potential when their internal basic needs are met. One of the basic needs after air, nourishment and shelter, is the need for emotional safety. Simply, this means all of us have an undeniable need to be affirmed, valued, appreciated and respected. Any leadership behavior that does not demonstrate sensitivity to these basic human needs will cause others to feel unsafe.

Simply put, followers will not follow a leader who makes them feel unsafe. Why? Please allow me to provide the basic logic. Our inherent human nature does not allow us to trust people who make us feel unsafe. We will not follow another whom we do not trust. Without followers you are not leading, even if you have the title that says so!

What is the appropriate approach? The golden rule provides the most succinct yet powerful core principle for effective leadership. In summary it states, “Treat people the way you wish to be treated”.

Some may suggest Mr. X is doing all right as a leader. After all, he has developed a national reputation as a leader. Conversely, he has also developed a correlating reputation as a difficult person who could dehumanize others in his quest for results. The real question is, “How much more effective could he be if he had the inner security to respond to those he leads with transparency and kindness?” How many people have quit following him who could have strengthened his success as well as their own, but left instead in search of a healthier leadership environment? How many missed opportunities have there been because he failed to treat others with compassion and kindness?

Powerful leadership results can transpire over a simple act of kindness. For instance, one could argue the great state of Alaska was acquired because of a missed single kind act. Witness the following compelling example of leadership and kindness.

President-elect Lincoln, while traveling by train, was deeply immersed in thought concerning the composition of his leadership cabinet. The choice for Secretary of State was still unfilled as he was torn between two highly respected finalists.

On the same train, in the same car, unbeknownst to each other, sat one of the men whom Lincoln was considering for the position of Secretary of State. He had an appointment to meet with Mr. Lincoln the next morning. While sipping brandy and pondering how he might win the prized appointment, he called for the steward to refill his glass. Because the steward was finishing pouring a beverage for another, he did not immediately respond. When he did arrive moments later, the man berated the steward for serving a man of his own stature in such a poor manner. Excoriating him not to let it happen again, he sent the embarrassed servant away.

Mr. Lincoln heard the exchange. The next day Mr. Lincoln chose the other finalist, William Seward, later responsible for purchasing the Alaskan territory amidst great criticism. Asked why he did not choose the other man (who had ridden in his same coach car the previous day), Lincoln responded, “In this age of incivility, I want a man who will treat others with civility and kindness. I became convinced, due to personal experience, that one candidate perhaps lacked such character.”

Wise are the leaders who encourage genuine kindness and courtesy as an essential aspect of their core leadership style. Do not underestimate its impact on your influence as a leader. Believe me, your followers will not!

Listening to Learn

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Winning attitudes translate into success at all levels. Recognizing and emulating the winning attitude of a successful person is not just a compliment to a role model, it’s an essential element in developing your own success. A good friend, Joe, recently told a story which makes this point as relevant today as when he first learned it.

Joe possesses a winning attitude which has translated into a very successful company and he is a man that others watch; however, Joe began life focused on himself rather than on the successes of others, a flaw he had to overcome quickly in college:

“When I was a freshman playing football I was ready to set the world
on fire. I thought I had arrived and it was just a matter of showing it
to my teammates,” he laughed. “One day I was standing in line in the
weight room waiting for a machine and I was talking most of my wait.
After a while I heard an imposing voice behind me ask ‘Do you want
to be good?’ I turned around to find the 6’8” senior captain of the
football team behind me. He was revered for his athletic abilities
and leadership and I was surprised by his question.

He asked me again: ‘Do you want to be good?’

Yes sir, I do, I said.

‘Then stop talking and start learning,’ he commanded. ‘There are
veteran players on those machines; have you observed their
technique. Are you watching to learn what they do? On this team, if
you want to succeed there are no wasted moments. You can talk, or
you can wait quietly in line and learn; but only if you want to be good.’

That was a lesson I never forgot. I apply it every day in my work, and
I teach my executives to do the same: be quiet to learn.

We all face times waiting for growth in our careers and personal lives; we all have experienced stalled economies that slow our goals and dreams, when our aspirations can’t advance as quickly as we desire. At those times, it feels as if we’re standing in a slow line instead of being in the center of the action. However, how we handle those moments is the key to being good. We can chose to determine our future success by maximizing the opportunities in front of us during those stalled moments. Instead of complaining about circumstances, miring ourselves in excuses or becoming complacent until it’s our turn to receive our desired progress, we need to observe, learn and anticipate results. When the wait is over a plan should be ready to execute. Significant advancement does not happen by taking the waiting periods for granted. Forward-thinking leadership uses waiting periods for growth and improvement.

So, who are you watching and emulating? Are you investing in your own development, personally and professionally? How are you turning what may possibly be your most difficult challenges into blessings in disguise? When Joe was standing in the midst of his peers wasting time and distracting his teammates, he could have become defensive when confronted by his team captain and dismissed the message he needed to hear. Instead, Joe abandoned his ego in order to absorb direction from a successful player, and he made that lesson his own. How prepared are you to check your ego, to be quiet and welcome learning opportunities during the slow times? Will you be ready to initiate a new strategy the moment your wait is over, or will you still be standing in a slow line waiting for your turn?

Leadership and Getting Out of Its Way

Monday, February 15th, 2010

While having coffee with a friend who possesses a larger-than-life personality, and the physique to match, he shared a story regarding his twelve year old son, the quarterback of a team for whom he is the head coach. Like everything else, my friend is big into leadership and relishes every opportunity to pass leadership principles onto his son.

My friend said that he had been pushing his son for some time to show more leadership, and to offer motivating challenges to his teammates while in the huddle between plays. The big man shared an important lesson he learned from his son regarding his attempts to lead by constant example:

During practice I had this habit of joining the huddle almost every play and offering words of wisdom to players who needed instruction and guidance. I was becoming annoyed with my son because I did not see him practice the same behavior with his teammates that I was attempting to instill in him. Over dinner one night, I pushed him to not merely be a player; I said he had a responsibility to be a leader and that he wasn’t exhibiting leadership with his teammates.

The next day I continued to offer words of encouragement to the boys in the huddle. I waited impatiently for my son to speak up rather than having instruction come only from me. Another coach meanwhile asked me to come to the sideline to attend some other matter. All of a sudden I heard my son barking orders confidently in the huddle. Amazed, I watched at a distance as this continued for several plays. I was equally impressed how the boys responded to my son’s directives.

After practice I asked my son, “What got into you out there in the huddle? You finally started acting like a leader.”

My son replied with a statement that humbled me with one of those life lesson moments:

“Dad I have been trying to lead,” he said. “But you were so big in the huddle that there was no room left for me.”

My friend recalled the power of that moment for him, both personally and professionally, because it had a direct application to the company that he owned and operated as well. He shared that in the first few years after he purchased his company, he was constantly bothered that his managers relied on him to make every important decision.

Up until then, I thought the problem was with them. On the way home from my son’s practice that night, I realized I was the problem, not my managers! I thought that I had to be in on every play to help my operating team. I didn’t want them to fail so I constantly intervened in my managers’ decisions. I realized I was doing the same thing with my managers at work that I was doing with my son on the football field. I insisted on being “so big” in the decisions of my leaders that I was preventing them from the chance to grow and to lead. They didn’t trust themselves to make decisions because my over-involvement displayed my own lack of trust in them. I learned that sometimes one of the most powerful moments for a leader is to just get out of the way.

Today my friend’s company is known across the Midwest as leading the way in developing highly engaged and high results environments. He is recognized for growing leaders from within his own organization. Frequently, while speaking to business leaders desiring to duplicate his success, my friend recounts that one of the most important steps along his journey was the day he realized that great leadership sometimes means just getting out of the huddle and out of the way. Only until he was willing to change himself in this regard, could my friend expect to see changes in his leaders as well.

Leading Successfully Starts With WhoYou ARE, Not With What You DO!

Monday, February 1st, 2010

One of my executive clients was interviewing for a leadership position at the helm of a prestigious national sports team. Asking for my help to prepare for the interview process, I readily agreed, and I asked him to be prepared for a mock interview.

At the onset of our practice interview, he pulled out a notebook and began to explain his system of interviewing and recruiting players that had been part of his success!

“Bill (not his real name), what are you doing?” I asked.

“This system is the key to my success,” he confided.

“Bill, if you go in there telling them what you do as the basis for your success, you will lose them right there. Everyone else competing for this job will do the same thing. It’s not about what you do, it’s about who you are that distinguishes you from the rest.”

I went on to explain to Bill that no one buys into a leader’s system until they buy into the leader first. They will not trust his approach until they trust the person behind the approach.

I challenged him to share his passion and vision first: what gets him out of bed in the morning, and why it matters so much to him. I coached him to describe his non-negotiable values and illustrate how they guide his life and serve as a filter for all key decisions he makes, both personally and professionally.

“Bill, share how the impact of your values will positively affect the organization, and then ask the owner if he would support these values at any cost as the basis for building a trusted organization. Everyone else is going for a job interview to sell themselves. You are way beyond that. You are going in that room not to get a job, but to be yourself, with quiet, confident and humble assurance.”

Bill questioned the approach: “What if he’s turned off?”

“It’s just information,” I reminded him. “If he is turned off by you being true to yourself from the start, then do you really want to partner with someone like that? If this owner is anyone of real substance, he will understand that you cannot lead others if you haven’t developed and incorporated an internal map to lead yourself first. He will know that truly great leaders have a clear sense of self. From your clarity of values, those around you will rise to the level of your convictions.

That is leadership Bill. Only after you have shown who you are can you begin to discuss your methods of success. Everyone has methods. Not everyone has clarity of purpose or a clear sense of self. This will set you apart.”

We went on to finish the trial interview and I made some final comments. A week later, Bill came back to me and described the actual interview:

“You know Fred, your advice was right on target. The owner expected everyone at that level of expertise to have a proven system. He had already called around the league and knew everyone’s approaches before the interviews. More than that, he really wanted to understand what kind of leaders we were and whether we were led by the shouts of others or by the whispers inside of ourselves.”

Three days later, the respective owner announced his decision: my client, Bill, was awarded the position! I don’t know who was happier, him or me.

It is true that people will follow us, not because what we do, but because of who we are. Who we are always precedes what we know, what we do, and how we do it. It is one of the non-negotiable principles of effective leadership.

What does Leadership Success take?

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Five Conditions That Can Make or Break Your Success

There is an immense difference between being a good leader and a great one. Effective leaders, like Olympic champions, are developed through training, experience and mentoring. The most successful executives understand that their success is reliant on the fact that they continue to challenge themselves – both in their thinking and through their performance. Becoming a true champion comes with practice, practice, practice and key coaching to refine skills and accelerate improvement.

Great leadership involves the ability to create positive momentum in times of high change. This requires mastering skills such as casting the vision, executing communication, weighing possibilities and seeking new opportunities. Great leaders are highly skilled in cultivating synergy among employees to ensure a company has both direction and growth. All of these attributes are critical and necessary to the success of any company – perhaps even more so in a down economy.

John Kotter says, “Leaders set direction, leaders align people by communicating their vision at all levels and leaders motivate and inspire.” InitiativeOne’s curriculum is based on just that – refining some of the core skills that allow leaders to decide direction, align people and inspire.

Leadership is truly all about influence – are you working on the skills that enable you to influence others through motivation and direction in order to achieve your company’s goals? There is a vast return on this investment both professionally and organizationally – even in today’s economic environment.

At an organizational level, leaders must know the basic conditions that generate the greatest chance of success. According to a recent article in the Harvard Business Review titled “Why teams don’t work”, there are five critical conditions that make the difference between success and failure – all of which are included in InitiativeOne leadership training. These are:

  1. Teams must be real – People have to know who is on the team and who is not. It is the leader’s job to make that clear.
  2. Teams need a compelling direction – Members need to know – and agree on – what they’re supposed to be doing together. Unless a leader articulates a clear direction, there is a real risk that different members will pursue different agendas.
  3. Teams need enabling structures – Teams that have poorly designed tasks, the wrong number or mix of members, or fuzzy and unenforced norms of conduct invariably get into trouble.
  4. Teams need a supportive organization – The organizational context – including the reward system, the human resource system and the information system – must facilitate team work.
  5. Teams need expert coaching – Most executive coaches focus on individual performance, which does not significantly improve teamwork. Teams need coaching as a group in team processes – especially at the beginning, midpoint and end of a team project.

If you wisely choose to invest in your leadership development or your team’s leadership development, we hope you’ll choose InitiativeOne. We have many offerings from a “Dr. Fred Online Tune Up” to Executive Coaching to our Signature, nine-week process of comprehensive skill building and leadership development. Contact us directly at 920-246-5175 or info@initiative-one.com.

Our business is based on word of mouth referrals, so don’t forget to mention us to a friend/company you know who could benefit from expert help in the area of leadership development. And, don’t forget to ask us for examples regarding the effectiveness of our work – we have worked with hundreds of companies and have many references!

Emerge from the Dark Side

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Emerge from the Dark Side
How Just Paying the Rent Can Draw You Over

Those who have participated in an Initiative One Leadership Process are familiar with the term “pay the rent” (PTR). PTR describes the daily, ongoing firefighting, immediate problem solving activity that is part of every leader’s day. PTR consists of those mundane but necessary things that are the essence of performing the business. Pay the rent is important because if we are not successful in this endeavor, there is a strong likelihood we won’t last long enough to achieve our Vision by reaching our critical goals.

Excelling in PTR is essential to achieve a high level of customer service and the resulting high satisfaction. Show me a company that ignores PTR and I’ll show you a company with a poor level of customer satisfaction.

The problem with “pay the rent” is that it can become all consuming, and in fact does, for many companies and their leaders. PTR is reactive, not pro-active. I remember one executive who obviously liked being stuck in “pay the rent” mode. He told me, “I don’t have time to focus on vision, values, and critical goals. In fact, I don’t need to. Everyday I just show up and problems always find me. Staying busy is not a problem.”

This executive demonstrated the unhealthy, dark side of pay the rent. This man had succumbed to and embraced the dark side. When one is immersed in pay the rent, and not balanced by a strategic focus on higher, long-term goals, the price is the abdication of leadership. When leaders are driving the vision, communicating and measuring critical goals, they are setting the agenda for others to follow. However when they can’t get out of PTR, everyone else sets the agenda for them. They may be busy, but in the long-run they will not be effective. Remember, leaders measure their effectiveness, not by merely being busy, but by the impact of their efforts.

How do so many of us fall into the grip of excessive PTR so easily?

There are five telltale pitfalls that lead to the dark side:

People Pleasing – The desire to have another person like us or respect us is universal for all of us. Unfortunately it can damage our effectiveness. This trap occurs when we frequently acquiesce to another person’s expectations which have nothing to do with advancing our own purposes and responsibilities in the organization.
Poor Boundaries – Typically, to avoid conflict with others, we avoid difficult conversations in which we must communicate that we do not have the time, the resources, or even organizational sanction to invest in their priorities.
Less Than Impeccable Communication – We often fall into the unhealthy side of PTR when we avoid negotiating with a person whose demands, timelines, or expectations are not reasonable. Because we will not lead ourselves, we abdicate our leadership to others who may be more direct, clearer, or more aggressive.
The Lure of Instant Gratification – Usually PTR involves a short-term payoff. One can solve a problem quickly and receive quick gratification. Unfortunately, high level goals and objectives almost always take much longer and require sustained discipline. While vision whispers, PTR screams. Because we become so preoccupied with the urgent, we lose our attention to the important.
The Unwillingness to Ask For Help – Just this week a leader explained to me that she found it difficult to focus on strategic level responsibilities. She stated she was afraid to ask her partners to cover her while she was in executive strategic planning sessions. She found herself trying to be in two places at once, letting down her client, her team who waited for her to show and herself for not fulfilling her commitment.
Ultimately, we fall into unproductive “pay the rent” when we try to be all things to all people. In doing so, we eventually become nothing to everyone, including ourselves.

In conclusion, allow me to challenge you to a call to action that might be eye-opening. Chart a typical week’s activity in 30 minute intervals; from the time you arrive at work to when you end your workday. At the end of the week, add up how many hours you spent in “pay the rent” firefighting instead of activity that focused on advancing your highest goals and objectives. Most people are surprised at the outcome. You may find you have unknowingly drifted to the dark side.

Leadership in the Crosswinds

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Leadership in the Crosswinds
How Safe Are You in Business Turbulence?

I was nervous. I could feel the perspiration on my palms and extreme tension in my jaws. My regional jet was about to land at Chicago O’Hare in 40 mile-per-hour crosswinds. I had heard an off duty pilot riding in the jump seat behind me tell one of the flight attendants that our plane was designed to withstand crosswinds up to 35 miles per hour. I didn’t like the way the math was adding up here.

The lady next to me grabbed my arm and hung on for dear life as we descended to the runway, bouncing like a kernel in a corn popper. A few feet above the ground, an instant before landing, a huge gust of wind caught the side of the plane and blew us off of the runway and into the grass. At the moment of contact, the pilot gunned the engines and soared back into the sky, over the terminal, banked at such a sharp angle that it felt like riding in a fighter plane. The smell of regurgitated food instantly permeated the cabin. The sound of people gagging into their air sickness bags was extremely unnerving. It was the first time I had ever flown that I was genuinely scared.

What came next was a fascinating lesson in leadership. Within seconds after righting the plane, the pilot’s calm, clear voice, came over the intercom. He stated simply, “That is what we call a touch and go. I am really sorry about what just happened. As you can tell the conditions were too windy. Air traffic control is directing us to a runway that points at a better angle for today’s weather conditions. You are safe. The plane is under complete control. No maintenance situation exists. Relax. We are circling once and will land again in five minutes.”

As the pilot spoke, you could feel the tension in the cabin dissipate. I marveled at how the captain was able to keep a near panic situation from erupting into bedlam, helping to restore an almost normal mood among nauseous passengers.

As I pondered the situation later – after changing my pants – I observed several important traits that true leaders naturally demonstrate in rapid change environments:

The pilot openly communicated to those under his command in a responsive, timely fashion. Over communicating in times of high change is a must for followers to feel safe in the unpredictable environment of unending, sometimes uncontrollable change that is often the norm in today’s business environments.
He acknowledged the apprehensions of the passengers. Rather than ignore or minimize the concerns that people were having in the cabin, he addressed them head-on. He apologized in a manner that acknowledged everyone including experienced fliers, thereby validating their individual fears and apprehension. Leaders who create a culture of “putting all issues on the table” are able to navigate better the tense moments that the invariables of high change create. While there is discomfort in the moment of addressing the situation in an open and direct manner, the storm typically dissipates much faster.
He faced the issue head-on. Leaders who try to “manage the message” in tense situations by pretending issues don’t exist, by managing the flow of information, or by creating spin for bad news, typically make difficult those situations worse. When the issues go under the table, issues grow, not go. Deal with the pain before it deals with you! True leaders learn to be comfortable with the uncomfortable.
The pilot set the tone through calm behavior. In times of high change, followers crave some measure of predictability. They respect leaders who are consistently reassuring and under control in high stress moments. Leaders who are able to exhibit self-control will find themselves in control because they will have followers who want to follow them. When a leader is stressed, the menu of leadership effectiveness does not include engaging in shouting, threatening, blaming and other such aggressive behaviors.
Ultimately, this captain demonstrated traits that created an environment of safety in the midst of uncertainty. A secret of effective leaders is that when they become “safe” with their people, problem solving effectiveness increases dramatically. The safer we are to them, the more open and forthcoming people will be in delivering pertinent information, a must in managing in the crosswinds of turbulent change. How safe is your leadership role?